How Korean Heritage and Artifact Names Are Written in English

If you are putting together English material about Korean cultural heritage, whether a museum label, a site panel, a catalog entry or a travel guide, the names will take longer than the sentences around them. The good news is that most of them have already been decided somewhere. Knowing where to look saves most of the work.

Korean names are packed with information

A Korean heritage name usually looks like a single word but holds several pieces of information. Pulling it apart first makes the English much easier.

Cheongja sanggam moranmun pyojubak-moyang jujeonja

cheongja = celadon · sanggam = inlay · moranmun = peony pattern

pyojubak-moyang = gourd-shaped · jujeonja = ewer

English does not simply reverse this. It re-sequences it.

Korean: material → method → design → shape → type

English: material → shape → type → (with) method → design


→ Celadon Gourd-shaped Ewer with Inlaid Peony Design

Building names work along the same lines, pairing a proper name with a word for the kind of structure. Hwaseong Haenggung, for instance, combines a place name with haenggung, a palace a king used temporarily.

Some parts stay Korean, some become English

Which parts keep their Korean sound depends on what kind of heritage you are dealing with.

  • Buildings, sites and intangible heritage keep the whole Korean name, with an English word attached for the type: Gyeongbokgung Palace, Bulguksa Temple, Jongmyo Shrine, Ganggangsullae (Circle Dance).
  • Ceramics, metalwork and Buddhist sculpture go the other way, with each element translated. The ewer above is one example; another is Bronze Kundika with Silver-inlaid Willow and Waterfowl Design.

Neither approach works on its own. Romanize everything and the reader learns nothing about the object. Translate everything and the Korean name disappears, along with whatever distinguishes it from a Chinese or Japanese equivalent.

This is also why Bulguksa Temple looks redundant, since sa already means temple. The repetition is deliberate. It keeps the name people actually use on site while telling the reader what sort of place it is. Bulguk Temple would be a form nobody says.

Korea’s naming standard goes further than these two groups and sets out separate methods for paintings, records, inscriptions, tombs and other categories. If what you have does not fit either group above, it is worth a look.

Look for an official name before inventing one

Most well-known heritage already has an official English name, so heritage translation usually starts with looking rather than writing. The Korea Heritage Service publishes these names alongside the Korean ones, and its English-language site at english.khs.go.kr can be searched under Explore Heritage. Museums, the local government, the managing institution and UNESCO listings are worth checking too.

Gyeongbokgung Palace, Hwaseong Fortress, Suwon and Sungnyemun Gate, Seoul are all registered forms. You may well think of something that reads better, but using the official name saves an argument later.

A name that turns up in a search engine is a different matter. Travel sites, blogs and promotional material carry English names too, and popularity is not authority. It is worth noticing which institution uses a name, and whether that institution actually designates, holds or manages the heritage. Jot down where you found it and when, since sites get reorganized and standards get revised.

Why spellings differ between sources

English-language material on Korea does not use one romanization system, which can be confusing.

Korea’s current system dates from 2000. A good deal of older scholarship, and some newer work, uses the earlier McCune-Reischauer system, which spells the same words noticeably differently. Personal names add another layer, since long-established spellings are usually kept rather than regularized, which is how you get Yi Sun-sin.

In practice: use the official name where there is one, use current romanization when you are creating a form, leave older spellings alone inside quotations, and try not to mix systems within one publication.

When there is no official name

Plenty of things have none: local facilities, festival programs, recently built cultural spaces. At that point you are deciding which part of the name is the proper noun and which part needs explaining.

Hwaseong Haenggung is a useful model. Its registered form is Temporary Palace at Hwaseong Fortress, Suwon. Haenggung is explained rather than romanized so the function is clear, and Hwaseong is tied back to the existing Hwaseong Fortress.

Where the answer is not obvious, it is usually better to put together two or three options with your reasoning and let the institution choose than to settle it yourself.

Periods and people

Dynasty names mean little without dates. Giving them at first mention and dropping them afterwards is the usual approach.

Goryeo Dynasty (918–1392) first mention

Goryeo thereafter

Family names come first, and monarchs are normally given as King Jeongjo so the reader can place them. Figures known by more than one name need a decision. The admiral’s tomb is registered as Tomb of Yi Sun-sin even though the Korean uses his posthumous title, because the title alone would not identify him to an English reader. An academic catalog and a visitor panel need not make the same choice, as long as one publication makes it once.

Keep the names somewhere

Names kept inside documents get buried with them, so you or whoever comes next ends up researching the same artifact from scratch. If that research lands differently, you end up with two names for one thing. A short terminology list held separately solves it, with a little more recorded than the translation.

FieldExample
Korean nameCheongja sanggam unhakmun maebyeong
English formCeladon Prunus Vase with Inlaid Cloud and Crane Design
Where it came fromKorea Heritage Service, official form
Checked2026-08-30
StatusConfirmed / Provisional

The last three rows are the ones that earn their place. Without a source, the next person repeats the research. Without a status, something still under discussion travels into other material as though it were settled.

If you want to go further

  • Korea Heritage Service, English site (english.khs.go.kr). Official English names for designated heritage, searchable under Explore Heritage.
  • Rules on the English Notation of State Heritage Names. The naming standard itself, with worked examples for each category of heritage. Published in Korean, and covering English forms only.
  • Revised Romanization of Korean, National Institute of Korean Language. The current romanization system.

Between them these cover most of what comes up. Anything left over is usually a question for the institution that holds the object.

In Korean heritage translation the names are where the care goes. The prose around them is usually the easier half.